首页> 外文OA文献 >The enabling and protective role of academic buoyancy in the appraisal of fear appeals used prior to high stakes examinations
【2h】

The enabling and protective role of academic buoyancy in the appraisal of fear appeals used prior to high stakes examinations

机译:学术浮力在高风险考试之前评估恐惧诉求中的促进作用和保护作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

© 2015, © The Author(s) 2015. Prior to high stakes examinations, teachers may engage in instructional practices to encourage their students to prepare well for their exams, including the use of ‘fear appeals’. The current study examined whether academic buoyancy played a role in student appraisals of fear appeals as threatening or challenging. High school students (N = 770) preparing for high-stakes mathematics exams in England completed self-report measures of the frequency with which their teacher used fear appeals, how they appraised those fear appeals, and their academic buoyancy. In line with prediction, students appraised fear appeals as more threatening and challenging as the frequency of fear appeal use increased. When fear appeals were used more frequently, a challenge appraisal was more likely when academic buoyancy was higher. Although a threat appraisal was less likely when academic buoyancy was higher, the protective influence diminished when fear appeals were used more frequently. Educational implications are discussed.
机译:©2015,©作者2015。©高风险考试之前,老师可能会进行教学练习,鼓励学生为考试做准备,包括使用“恐惧呼吁”。当前的研究检查了学术浮力是否在学生对恐惧呼吁的威胁或挑战的评估中起作用。在英格兰准备参加高分数学考试的高中生(N = 770)完成了自我报告的衡量标准,即他们的老师使用恐惧呼吁的频率,如何评估这些恐惧呼吁以及他们的学术浮力。与预测相符,学生对恐惧诉求的评价随着威胁诉求使用频率的增加而更具威胁性和挑战性。当恐惧呼吁被更频繁地使用时,当学术浮力较高时,进行挑战评估的可能性就更大。尽管在学术浮力较高时不太可能进行威胁评估,但在更频繁地使用恐惧呼吁时,保护性影响就会减弱。讨论了教育意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号